The Day the Learning Died

A terrible thing happened a few weeks ago and it has taken me awhile to sort out how I feel.  As part of cost-cutting measures made necessary by budgetary constraints to the school district, ten helping teachers lost their positions, five of them from the IML (Information Media Literacy) department. This means the complete elimination of this department, and a move away from supporting teachers and teacher-librarians as they attempt to update their practice, embrace inquiry learning and use technology effectively and purposefully in their classrooms.  I don't get it.

In the past year alone, our school district has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars providing technology, resources, professional development and support to teachers, students and schools working towards innovative and effective learning.  More money has gone towards the creation of learning commons in many of our school.  At the heart of this movement are +Kevin Amboe, +Shelagh Lim, +Orwell Kowalyshyn, +Lisa Domeier and Sarah Guilmant-Smith. They are the public face of educational reform......and they walk the walk.   Surrey is the proud owner of a Twitter hashtag and iTunes U account that is widely respected throughout North America.  Surrey teachers publish and share and innovate and collaborate and on and on and on.  This team of educators are our cheerleaders, mentors and the ones that push us onto the public stage.  They make us better than we are.  We cannot afford to lose the good ones.

It has taken over ten years for us early adapters to see shifts in the educational landscape to the point that 21st century learning is becoming widespread and necessary.  Even the new BC Ed curriculum stresses the obvious:

One of the core tenets of the BC Education Plan is that there will be increased emphasis on the teaching of 21st century competencies like creativity, critical thinking, problem solving, digital literacy, emotional literacy, interpersonal skills, and collaboration. Many people want assurance though, that this doesn’t come at the expense of foundational skills.

And now, what?  There is evidence that professional development makes an incredible difference to the effectiveness of teachers. The loss of these helping teachers is going to mean, at best, a significant slowdown in the acquisition of essential skills by students and teachers alike.  One of my biggest fears hinges on knowing that without significant changes in teacher pedagogy, tech integration is ineffective.  I fear that three years from now, someone in charge will look at the expensive technology deployed in 2013 - 2014, realize it had little impact on student achievement and decide tech integration wasn't worth it after all.  They will embrace instead the standardized test.  They will ignore what I know is true - that tech integration needs creative teaching, risk-taking and courage to work.  That students can be engaged and connected and achieve and create and learn.  That all students can be included.  That knowledge is at every students' fingertips.  That... as Albert Einstein reminds us......creativity is intelligence having fun.  That hurts my spirit.

 

Around and Around We Go

I am so dismayed by the events taking place in the education sector in British Columbia.  For those people who haven't noticed, once again the BCTF and the provincial government are poised to agree to disagree and the result is walkouts and lockouts. It is a no-win situation for everyone affected - teachers, parents, students.

There are a lot of issues worth discussing - class size and composition, the recent court win by the BCTF that is once more under appeal, the downloading of capital costs and seismic upgradings to the districts, the loss of librarian and counselling positions, new curriculum changes, questions around assessment, how to meet the needs of the increasing number of special needs students, how to fund field trips and presenters when we can't ask parents for money...............and more.

I have heard parents commenting on how dirty the schools have become and how overwhelmed the teachers seem to be.  And I have had parents tell me how lazy teachers are.  There is a chasm between the stakeholders that I don't believe can be breached. Instead of focusing on what really matters, there is finger-pointing and name-calling.  It is bewildering to me.

One thing I do not understand is where is the press?  Where are the journalists and where is the "respected" media willing to sift through the rhetoric and actually report the facts.  I recently saw a news item on the cancellation of Vancouver School Board's string program - a video of children with their instruments trying hard to convince the public they should still support funding their program.  The fact is that many, many programs have already been cut.  Library programs, learning support programs, counselling programs, early literacy programs - the list goes on and on.  Where is the public discussion?  If we, as a society, are fine with these cuts, why would we care about a strings program? 

Immigration and refugee policy is set by government, but it is teachers who deal with the lack of prior schooling and the trauma.  It is teachers who teach the children English and social skills.  Who funds this support because there is very little of it? And the impact on our most at-risk students is significant.  (To learn more, read this article about the impact of privatization on low-income students.)

The truth is that the only programs that have not been cut are ones guaranteed in the teacher contract... AND that is why teachers continue to fight for reduced class sizes and library, counselling and learning support.  These guarantees became part of the teacher's contract in the 1990s when teachers agreed to zero wage increases in exchange for better student support.

I heard about people circulating an email about the BCTF in which they mock the practice of thanking our First Nations for the use of their traditional lands.  Why is this the most important part of the conversation?  Why ridicule anyone for being polite and respectful, irregardless of your own beliefs.  This is the crux of the problem.  We focus on the superficial issues and miss out on what really matters - the educational experience of our children.

I think that the government needs to be honest with the public and admit that they can't or won't continue to fund public education at the level to which we expect.  Their proposal of a two-tier wage for new hires, no significant raise, a threatened sanction for not doing recess supervision and their avowal that they cannot afford classroom compositions that are manageable, all suggest the government is looking to pinch their pennies to limit the education costs.  That is a no-brainer.  They have their position and they are committed to it, but I suspect they know there would be limited public support if they had a frank and honest dialogue with the public over their endgame (I suspect privatization and teachers replaced by untrained staff).

I believe in sustainability and I think that if we can no longer afford public education in its' present form, then we should start to have public discourse on what needs to change.  (Read the about the government's position on the affordability of teacher's demands.)  Do we need to change our funding priorities, change our curriculum, charge a fee to parents, change the way we deliver education?  (To learn more about how educational funding is siphoned off read this article by +David Truss) These discussions need to be help publicly not behind closed doors in Victoria.

I think they need to acknowledge the teachers are doing the best they can with the resources available and admit that they are still entitled to be respected.  There is a lack of support for the needs of  the teaching profession that need to be addressed.  Why send your child to school all day to a teacher you rage against and disparage at home?  Teachers are a pivotal part of any child's journey.  Recent studies carried out in the United States show that there is a significant disparity between the salaries of teachers from the U.S. and teachers from countries where students are ranked by PISA as high-performing.  Canada and British Columbia possess one of these high-performing educational systems. Higher wages ensure that candidates for teacher training and positions are plentiful and that only the "best" candidates are chosen.  Countries with lower wages, such as the United States, have difficulty attracting effective candidates.  In many places, if ineffective and incompetent teachers were fired there would be no possibility of replacing them due to the low wages and difficult working conditions.  Strong candidates can find other work.  The morale of the story.......you get what you pay for.

I think the public feels free to criticize teachers because they believe the school system is the same as it was when they were working their way through it.  It isn't. It really, really isn't. Teachers work in an environment where their only audience is children.  I think parents should actively volunteer in their child's class.  Maybe Premiers and Education Ministers should too.

I think that the stress of doing the job, fundraising, defending, planning and fighting over resources is driving teachers away from the classroom.

I think that is sad.

What Attending the Apple Institute Has Taught Me About Engaging Educators

What Attending the Apple Institute Has Taught Me About Engaged Educators

It has been a few weeks since I returned from the North American ADE 2013 Institute in Austin, Texas, and it is about time for me to reflect on the entire, breath-taking experience.

Many of the ADEs have already posted their own thoughts.  One good example comes from Kyle Pearce who is a new ADE from Ontario, Canada.  He has shared both his application video and his reflections on attending his first institute.   The highlight for him (and others) was the opportunity to connect with other like-minded educators with a shared vision for teaching.  This theme runs through many other postings. Courtney Pepe, an ADE from New Jersey shared her Top 10 List and Kristi Meeuws, another new ADE from South Carolina, reflects on the shared experience.  Daniel Whitt and Beth Sanders from Youth Culture Converts captured the energy of many ADEs attending the conference. 

The Institute is a non-stop affair.   As Troy Bagwell writes - We Were on Fire.   In just four days, I attended many world-class sessions and had not only the best professional learning in my career but possible the best educational experience of my life.  The presenters ranged from those who are world-renowned (Bill Frakes, Rebecca Stockey and Nancy Duarte) to those enthusiastic experts such as Bea Cantor (download and read her book on macro photography).  There is no describing the energy and enthusiasm filling the room and every single educator there actively seeks out opportunities to learn, write, engage, network, debate, comfort and support a team of 400.  And they commit to creating content throughout their summer holidays.  It is amazing because it so rarely happens in other settings.  And that is what I have been pondering these last few weeks - what makes this group and this institute so unique?

First - The educators at these events are told they are valued - that what they are doing matters and is special and meaningful for students.  This is reinforced throughout the week - ADEs showcase their work and share their best moments. Given the current climate in British Columbia and other North American districts, teacher appreciation has become anything but the norm.  It is amazing how being accepted and acknowledged energized everyone in the room.

Second - The content offered is meaningful and world-class.  It is not dumbed-down and it goes beyond the basics.  If you need to catch up to what is happening after a session, there are people ready to help.  In Austin, impromptu sessions were held well into the evenings - run by "ordinary teachers" with something to share.  Do you want to know how an app works or have a question about lighting while taking photographs - there is someone standing beside you to help.

Third - There is a common goal.  It is unwritten but omnipresent - ADEs are aiming for an enriched, meaningful, interactive, high-level thinking educational experience for their students.  There is ongoing questioning of our own practice and it is OK to get help if you need it.  ADEs are goal-oriented and driven to create best practice.  This group consensus doesn't happen as often as it should in schools, and that is really too bad as that closed door mentality robs all teachers of opportunities for mentorship and team collaboration.

Fourth - Failure is celebrated.  Why?  Because someone took a risk, shared their ideas and everyone thought that was great. 

Fifth - ADEs make a commitment to create content - they read, they research, they document, they assess and they write it up and share it with others.  They are not passive and they do more than curate ideas. 

Sixth - ADEs blog.  They tweet.  They photograph.  They are artists and musicians.  They are life long learners and they are enthusiastic about what they do.  Their actions are public and I think that is a good thing when you consider that often the only people watching a teacher work are children.  ADEs know what they are doing is valuable and they want the world to know that they are actively working on finding the best path for students ALL THE TIME.

Do It For the Kids

Over the last few years I have heard teachers and stakeholders in the educational system state repeatedly state that despite criticism, despite opposing viewpoints, despite cutbacks, despite politics and despite evidence to the contrary, they are doing it for the kids. 

What are we in fact doing for them?  Are we updating our pedagogy?  Are we acknowledging that students no longer need the same educational experiences that we ourselves had?  Have we replaced out-of-date resources?  Have we ensured that we are nurturing 21st century learners - learners who use technology to create content and develop their critical thinking skills?

The BCTF and the provincial government have gone back and forth over the need to reinstate the specialist teaching positions lost in the past decade. I would argue that simply refilling those positions is not enough.  We need to look at what programs are working in what districts and direct resources to try and replicate those successes where there is need.  It is not enough to declare that students should bring their own device to school, when infrastructure is not consistently in place that can support it.  And we need tech facilitators (IML specialists) in schools.....educators who can support both teachers and students as the curriculum shifts to inquiry based learning and tech supported learning.

It concerns me that the decision makers are political creatures. They may have students' best interests at heart but they are also politically minded and ambitious. Teachers are the stake-holders who are most supported and most reviled in this process and part of the problem is that most of what we do is seen only by children. 

Private schools such as York House and St. George's get this. They support teachers with equipment, facilitators and infrastructure. This is what makes private schools so desirable to parents and such an enriched experience for their students. Teachers at these schools blog, tweet and email. They communicate. They make their programs transparent and are supported in this process. Parents are involved. Alumni fundraise and mentor their successors.  They are a learning community.

If we really are doing this for the kids, all the stakeholders in the education community need to do the same. Parents, politicians, teachers, alumni, district staff all need to take a good look at the system and shift it towards something that can work at least until the 23rd century.